Is novelty inherently bad? No. However, from a strategic business perspective, how should novelty factor into your business model or long term plan? It should be used cautiously and paired with the word temporary. Both Innovation and Novelty are cyclical, but their turnover rates are not equal. I subscribe to the theory that the life-cycle of novelty is much shorter than that of innovation.
I do believe that novelty can lead to innovation, but novelty should not be a long term strategy. When a product or service is novel, people are intrigued. As they become familiar with the item, however, their interest fades. This is the key reason why novelty is not a sustainable long term strategy.
Novelty can be a great play as a short term strategy (short term of course being relative, such as 1 to 3 years). This is because most novel things are easily replicated by competitors. This is true especially if you have just recently or not yet filed any trademarks or patents. The best example that comes to mind is that o…